
Diffuser versus volute
Randal FermanThe stator section of a centrifugal pump, after flow exits the impeller, is usually either a ‘diffuser’ or a ‘volute’. The purpose of each of these two stator types is to efficiently diffuse velocity energy into pressure. Diffusers are characterized by a plurality of radially symmetric diffusing passageways surrounding the impeller. Either a volute-shaped or annular collector is used in tandem with the diffuser. Volutes are most often characterized by one or two scroll-shaped diffusing passageways, depending on the pump configuration. Some multi-port ‘volute’ stators might just as well be called a ‘diffuser’. Occasionally there are overlapping characteristics and designation of stator type is arbitrary.

Most of the time the specifying engineer or end user does not decide on the type of stator to be used. By default it is determined by what the pump manufacturers’ offer. The principal deciding issues are manufacturability and cost, suitability for the application, modularity of design and efficiency.
For high pressure between bearings multi-stage pumps, diffuser designs are more compact compared to volute designs. Compactness generally translates into a smaller pump casing size and lower cost of materials and manufacturing.
Diffusers are normally designed as a one-piece or a two-piece ring assembly secured into the pump casing. Diffusers are modular components. For a given pump casing, variations of the diffuser passages can be designed to cover a range of operating conditions.

For a single stage centrifugal pump, a diffuser type design is usually more costly to produce because the diffuser ring is an extra part plus some incremental added machining for the casing. The casing must still function as a collector to convey the flow from the diffuser to the discharge nozzle. No matter how this is done, the diffuser can offer little comparative advantage in the size of a single-stage pump.
Diffuser designs are often more efficient at the best efficiency rate of flow, compared to that of a volute. Also, a custom diffuser can be made for each application in order to maximize the efficiency for a specific duty point.
A volute proponent might argue that the diffuser is less efficient at off-peak flow rates where the pump will operate a good portion of the time. The efficiency differences may not be significant and unless large amounts of power are involved, these debates seldom carry much weight in relation to the competing prices of the pumps offered, or user preference for either volute or diffuser.
Radial thrust acting on the impeller develops from a non-uniform circumferential pressure distribution. The stator design plays an important role in this. For some applications, especially with a single-stage overhung impeller type pump that will operate continuously at flows substantially away from its Best Efficiency Point flow, a diffuser/collector arrangement can provide a lower magnitude of radial thrust.
One of the two basic stator types may be particularly suited for specific applications. For instance, most API users of axial split case type BB3 between bearings pumps prefer opposed impellers in a double volute casing, which offers some assembly and maintainability advantages. Volute type casings are the norm for solids handling pumps that require wide open passageways. A few specialty high pressure single casing pumps utilize the structural support that the vaned diffuser can provide for the collector scroll. Vertical turbine and vertical bowl type casings are mostly of the vaned diffuser type.
Manufacturers have generally rationalized the choice of pump stator based on market needs, application requirements and production costs. Any evaluation regarding the selection of a diffuser or a volute should be considered in the context of specific pump types, specific applications and manufacturers’ product offerings.
For an independent evaluation of function and performance, contact an experienced consulting engineer who can help with your specific applications. See the complete list of Ekwestrel’s engineering services.
19 comments
Hello All,
I found this article very useful.
I found this article very useful. Actually, I’m experiencing a problem of excessive cavitation in a water pump (CW-Hydro, Inc., 1780 rpm, 510 m3/h, AMT: 180 mca, Shutoff Press: 21 kgf/cm2).
The pump has an excessive level of cavitation and vibration (2x, 3x rpm + high frequency) and has also a lot of wear on the volute. We already did some repair where put belzona but the problem continuous.
During these repairs, we machined (a little) the face of the scroll because excessive wear. So today we do not know if the clearance between the rotor and the faces (front and back) of the volute are as the manufacturer recommends. Unfortunately, we also did not get this information in the manufacturer’s manual.
Please, I would like your help, according to your experience in the subject, how much these clearances affect the performance of the pump and in cavitation. Do you would know, as a good practice, what these clearances (before, back and top rotor)?
Best regards,
Mathew,
It’s easy to understand why some users prefer an inner volute casing for a type BB5 versus a stacked diffuser arrangement. An important relative advantage of the volute arrangement you did not mention is reduction of unbalanced axial thrust. This is because the volute style is normally an opposed impeller arrangement. Opposed impeller arrangements are less prone to catastrophic failure due to a pump system upset. An opposed impeller arrangement for a stacked diffuser design adds complexity and cost to the assembly, is quite rare and is reserved only for the highest head applications such as for oil production water injection service.
I’ve never heard about the volute style being more forgiving of running clearances being out of spec. It may be easier to “sag bore” an inner volute casing to compensate for rotor sag, if that is deemed necessary.
Concerning the entrance area that you mention: axial tolerances on the stacked diffuser elements are easier to control. It is an inherent advantage with the diffuser design and it is possible to allow less internal clearance end float.
My personal inclination would be to evaluate the manufacturer’s installed based of the same model and size of pump, in similar conditions of service, as the main selection criterion. Offhand, I don’t think you should pay more than a 10 or 15 percent premium to go for the volute style, based on preference.
I trust this helps. Randal
Dear Randall,
Is there any design advantage of volute style BB5 over the diffuser style BB5 from a maintenance perspective? I understand it is easier to take the rotor out and put it back on an axially split volute compared to a radially split diffuser stack along with the ease for measuring the running clearances with a feeler gauge. However, is the volute style more forgiving to the running clearances being out of spec while putting back the pump compared to a diffuser style? Is that going to cause more axial thrust issue or performance issue on a diffuser than a volute style? Also is the entrance area from an impeller to diffuser much tighter compared to a volute? If so, does its become a hassle while reassembling a diffuser style pump compared to volute style?
Dear Sundararajan,
I see you posted your comment over a year ago. Not sure how I missed it. I do make an effort to keep the material readily comprehendable to those seeking general understanding of the topic.
Best regards,
Randal
Dear Mr Randal,
I find Your article interesting , and easily understandable.
I am offering consultancy on Mechanical seals for Rotating Equipment, and present technical presentation on Basics of Rotating Equipment and Sealing systems for Rotating Equipment.
Your article gives value input for seminars, and thank you very much.
Regards,
Sundararajan