
Diffuser versus volute
Randal FermanThe stator section of a centrifugal pump, after flow exits the impeller, is usually either a ‘diffuser’ or a ‘volute’. The purpose of each of these two stator types is to efficiently diffuse velocity energy into pressure. Diffusers are characterized by a plurality of radially symmetric diffusing passageways surrounding the impeller. Either a volute-shaped or annular collector is used in tandem with the diffuser. Volutes are most often characterized by one or two scroll-shaped diffusing passageways, depending on the pump configuration. Some multi-port ‘volute’ stators might just as well be called a ‘diffuser’. Occasionally there are overlapping characteristics and designation of stator type is arbitrary.

Most of the time the specifying engineer or end user does not decide on the type of stator to be used. By default it is determined by what the pump manufacturers’ offer. The principal deciding issues are manufacturability and cost, suitability for the application, modularity of design and efficiency.
For high pressure between bearings multi-stage pumps, diffuser designs are more compact compared to volute designs. Compactness generally translates into a smaller pump casing size and lower cost of materials and manufacturing.
Diffusers are normally designed as a one-piece or a two-piece ring assembly secured into the pump casing. Diffusers are modular components. For a given pump casing, variations of the diffuser passages can be designed to cover a range of operating conditions.

For a single stage centrifugal pump, a diffuser type design is usually more costly to produce because the diffuser ring is an extra part plus some incremental added machining for the casing. The casing must still function as a collector to convey the flow from the diffuser to the discharge nozzle. No matter how this is done, the diffuser can offer little comparative advantage in the size of a single-stage pump.
Diffuser designs are often more efficient at the best efficiency rate of flow, compared to that of a volute. Also, a custom diffuser can be made for each application in order to maximize the efficiency for a specific duty point.
A volute proponent might argue that the diffuser is less efficient at off-peak flow rates where the pump will operate a good portion of the time. The efficiency differences may not be significant and unless large amounts of power are involved, these debates seldom carry much weight in relation to the competing prices of the pumps offered, or user preference for either volute or diffuser.
Radial thrust acting on the impeller develops from a non-uniform circumferential pressure distribution. The stator design plays an important role in this. For some applications, especially with a single-stage overhung impeller type pump that will operate continuously at flows substantially away from its Best Efficiency Point flow, a diffuser/collector arrangement can provide a lower magnitude of radial thrust.
One of the two basic stator types may be particularly suited for specific applications. For instance, most API users of axial split case type BB3 between bearings pumps prefer opposed impellers in a double volute casing, which offers some assembly and maintainability advantages. Volute type casings are the norm for solids handling pumps that require wide open passageways. A few specialty high pressure single casing pumps utilize the structural support that the vaned diffuser can provide for the collector scroll. Vertical turbine and vertical bowl type casings are mostly of the vaned diffuser type.
Manufacturers have generally rationalized the choice of pump stator based on market needs, application requirements and production costs. Any evaluation regarding the selection of a diffuser or a volute should be considered in the context of specific pump types, specific applications and manufacturers’ product offerings.
For an independent evaluation of function and performance, contact an experienced consulting engineer who can help with your specific applications. See the complete list of Ekwestrel’s engineering services.
19 comments
Dear Lovepreet,
I’m happy to hear this information is helpful to you.
I assume your question concerns the balance device itself (which leaks into the balance line returning to suction).
A disk type balancing device can achieve 100% balance, but there is still need for a startup and shut down thrust bearing device. API 610 disallows the use of a close axial clearance for axial thrust balance. This exclusion effectively disallows disk type balancing devices.
A balance drum device will have some residual unbalance. The pump manufacturer must size the drum to compensate for as-new as well as worn clearances, across a range of head-flow conditions. The residual axial hydraulic unbalance is taken up by a separate thrust bearing arrangement.
Combination disk and drum balancing devices are sometimes used.
Best regards, Randal
Dear sir,
thank you very much this information is very helpful for me .plz….how much balancing done by balancing line in multistage pump and thrust bearing.
Regards
Lovepreet singh trainee HMEL india
Dear Tom W.,
I suggest choosing one or both of these two books: 1) Centrifugal Pumps, Second Edition by Johannn Friedrich Gülich and/or 2) The Interaction between Geometry and Performance of a Centrifugal Pump by B. Neumann.
Good luck on your project, Randal
Dear Mr. Ferman,
Me and my projectgroup are working on a schoolproject wich include researching different centrifugal pumps with in particular the centifugal pumps used by firefighting teams. Do you know any calculations or formulas we can use in our research? We are especially curious about the difference between calculations used for diffusor pumps and pumps without diffusor.
We hope that you will get back to us.
Kind regards, Tom Wittebrood
Dear Norman,
First of all, I do not personally use any of the available hydraulic design and CFD software packages. So by commenting on some of the products I’ve seen, I risk leaving out others that are worthy of mention.
CD-adapco offers CAE products and engineering services for a broad array of industries. This is a company to consider if you think you may need advanced engineering support in addition to proven CFD or FEA software.
NUMECA offers highly advanced CFD software and design services for a wide range of turbomachinery, fluid flow design and analysis projects.
Concepts NREC has been in the turbomachinery analysis, prototyping and software business for many years and offers a full suite of CAE and CAM software products. They have highly skilled technical staff that can help you through the most demanding turbomachinery design challenges.
TURBOdesign from Advanced Design Technology is a well-developed, user-friendly suite of turbomachinery CAE products. ADT is an international joint venture between the University College London and Ebara Research Co. Ltd.
Simerics offers attractive, fast and easy-to-use pump simulation CAE software.
ANSYS offers a broad range of CAE products for engineering analysis, including turbomachinery. If you’re looking for integrated CAE and simulation software that goes beyond pump hydraulic design and CFD, ANSYS is certainly worth looking into.
The above mentioned are among the best pump design CAE products out there. Prepare to have a robust budget. There are other products out there to consider and, of course, there are free software options. In your search and evaluation you will want to consider your individual or organization’s engineering requirements, product training, service support, access to design and analysis experts, validation of software results, software integration and budget.
I trust this has been of some help and I wish you the best of luck in finding the design package you’re looking for.
Randal